<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Media Metrics: Count Thank You&#8217;s, Not Click-Throughs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markdrapeau.com/2010/02/social-media-metrics-count-thank-yous-not-click-throughs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markdrapeau.com/2010/02/social-media-metrics-count-thank-yous-not-click-throughs/</link>
	<description>The Design of Engagement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 06:05:33 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ari Herzog</title>
		<link>http://www.markdrapeau.com/2010/02/social-media-metrics-count-thank-yous-not-click-throughs/comment-page-1/#comment-835</link>
		<dc:creator>Ari Herzog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markdrapeau.com/2010/02/social-media-metrics-count-thank-yous-not-click-throughs/#comment-835</guid>
		<description>I agree... to an extent. For Twitter fans, definitely. But what of blogging?

Take your blog, Mark. I would argue the click-through (how many people are reading) is more important than the thank you (how many people are commenting), wouldn&#039;t you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree&#8230; to an extent. For Twitter fans, definitely. But what of blogging?</p>
<p>Take your blog, Mark. I would argue the click-through (how many people are reading) is more important than the thank you (how many people are commenting), wouldn&#8217;t you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

