<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Expand Your Twitter Base</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markdrapeau.com/2009/04/expand-your-twitter-base/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markdrapeau.com/2009/04/expand-your-twitter-base/</link>
	<description>Innovative Social Engagement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 22:08:14 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Do You Take Twitter Personally? &#124; Cheeky Fresh</title>
		<link>http://www.markdrapeau.com/2009/04/expand-your-twitter-base/comment-page-1/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Do You Take Twitter Personally? &#124; Cheeky Fresh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 12:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markdrapeau.com/?p=193#comment-103</guid>
		<description>[...] You can&#8217;t possibly keep track of what everyone on Twitter is doing! So don&#8217;t try. Focus on yourself and what you want to get out of it. Spending too much time thinking about whay someone unfollowed you distracts from what should be much more important - saying interesting things. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You can&#8217;t possibly keep track of what everyone on Twitter is doing! So don&#8217;t try. Focus on yourself and what you want to get out of it. Spending too much time thinking about whay someone unfollowed you distracts from what should be much more important &#8211; saying interesting things. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrAkil</title>
		<link>http://www.markdrapeau.com/2009/04/expand-your-twitter-base/comment-page-1/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>DrAkil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markdrapeau.com/?p=193#comment-94</guid>
		<description>(First time visitor so you may have covered this already.) 

Unless I am a off-line friend of the &#039;Twitterer&#039; I would like to follow, it isn&#039;t necessary to tell me the mundane bits of their life. If the bio states they are a sports fanatic or a charity events coordinator that is what I want to read about. If something fantastic happens outside of the box I wouldn&#039;t mind hearing about it. At the same time, If the Twitterer can somehow tie it to the main subject they cover, even better. 

On another note, I am weary of receiving notification of why someone left, even if the answer is productive. I believe Qwitter useqwitter.com has caused an uproar among some because it causes &quot;drama.&quot; If I understand it correctly, Qwitter doesn&#039;t tell you why someone left, just identifies the last post you made before they decided to bolt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(First time visitor so you may have covered this already.) </p>
<p>Unless I am a off-line friend of the &#8216;Twitterer&#8217; I would like to follow, it isn&#8217;t necessary to tell me the mundane bits of their life. If the bio states they are a sports fanatic or a charity events coordinator that is what I want to read about. If something fantastic happens outside of the box I wouldn&#8217;t mind hearing about it. At the same time, If the Twitterer can somehow tie it to the main subject they cover, even better. </p>
<p>On another note, I am weary of receiving notification of why someone left, even if the answer is productive. I believe Qwitter useqwitter.com has caused an uproar among some because it causes &#8220;drama.&#8221; If I understand it correctly, Qwitter doesn&#8217;t tell you why someone left, just identifies the last post you made before they decided to bolt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob King</title>
		<link>http://www.markdrapeau.com/2009/04/expand-your-twitter-base/comment-page-1/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 18:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markdrapeau.com/?p=193#comment-85</guid>
		<description>Ari - Oh, perhaps my intent was not clear.  I did not desire any required mutuality.

We already receive notifications when someone follows us.  The optional field would allow someone to specify, at the time they click &quot;FOLLOW&quot; why they did it.  

My entering assumption - most people (or organizations) are curious or have a vested interest into WHY someone follows them. It allows them to assess what works.

If I&#039;m correct, then I&#039;d also assume those same people would take the time to provide a reason when following someone else. Some already do that, either a public &quot;@subbob I&#039;m following you because&quot; or a &quot;D subbob: Hey, I see we have the same interests.&quot;

But that requires two-steps - the follow action and the initiative to send a separate message. I don&#039;t know the science behind it, but each time you put an additional obstacle in the path, it will eliminate a certain percentage of people, even if they intended to follow through.

On the other end, when someone stops following you, currently no message is sent.

&quot;Twitter does not notify you when someone has stopped following you.&quot;
REF: http://help.twitter.com/forums/10711/entries/14019

In my suggested implementation, that remains the same UNLESS the person specifies a reason why. That allows people a method to provide constructive feedback (if appropriate) or perhaps to give another reason.

i.e.

@Subbob is no longer following you because &quot;your feed consists of 100% self-promotion, recommend rethinking how you interact.&quot;

or

@Subbob is no longer following you because &quot;I completed my project.  Thanks for the assistance.&quot;

At the risk of being long-winded (if not too late) - pseudo-code for implementation:

Just like Twitter asks &quot;What are you doing?&quot;, the option box would ask &quot;Why are you following&quot; &amp; &quot;Why are you stopping?&quot;, encouraging the person to answer the question.

Follow

if [$Reason  &quot;&quot;] then
  send &quot;$User is now following your updates on Twitter because &quot; + $Reason;
else
  send &quot;$User is now following your updates on Twitter.&quot;;
end

Stop Following

if [$Reason  &quot;&quot;]
  send &quot;$User stopped following your updates on Twitter because &quot; + $Reason;
end {implied &quot;else do nothing&quot; as it is now}</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ari &#8211; Oh, perhaps my intent was not clear.  I did not desire any required mutuality.</p>
<p>We already receive notifications when someone follows us.  The optional field would allow someone to specify, at the time they click &#8220;FOLLOW&#8221; why they did it.  </p>
<p>My entering assumption &#8211; most people (or organizations) are curious or have a vested interest into WHY someone follows them. It allows them to assess what works.</p>
<p>If I&#8217;m correct, then I&#8217;d also assume those same people would take the time to provide a reason when following someone else. Some already do that, either a public &#8220;@subbob I&#8217;m following you because&#8221; or a &#8220;D subbob: Hey, I see we have the same interests.&#8221;</p>
<p>But that requires two-steps &#8211; the follow action and the initiative to send a separate message. I don&#8217;t know the science behind it, but each time you put an additional obstacle in the path, it will eliminate a certain percentage of people, even if they intended to follow through.</p>
<p>On the other end, when someone stops following you, currently no message is sent.</p>
<p>&#8220;Twitter does not notify you when someone has stopped following you.&#8221;<br />
REF: <a href="http://help.twitter.com/forums/10711/entries/14019" rel="nofollow">http://help.twitter.com/forums/10711/entries/14019</a></p>
<p>In my suggested implementation, that remains the same UNLESS the person specifies a reason why. That allows people a method to provide constructive feedback (if appropriate) or perhaps to give another reason.</p>
<p>i.e.</p>
<p>@Subbob is no longer following you because &#8220;your feed consists of 100% self-promotion, recommend rethinking how you interact.&#8221;</p>
<p>or</p>
<p>@Subbob is no longer following you because &#8220;I completed my project.  Thanks for the assistance.&#8221;</p>
<p>At the risk of being long-winded (if not too late) &#8211; pseudo-code for implementation:</p>
<p>Just like Twitter asks &#8220;What are you doing?&#8221;, the option box would ask &#8220;Why are you following&#8221; &amp; &#8220;Why are you stopping?&#8221;, encouraging the person to answer the question.</p>
<p>Follow</p>
<p>if [$Reason  ""] then<br />
  send &#8220;$User is now following your updates on Twitter because &#8221; + $Reason;<br />
else<br />
  send &#8220;$User is now following your updates on Twitter.&#8221;;<br />
end</p>
<p>Stop Following</p>
<p>if [$Reason  ""]<br />
  send &#8220;$User stopped following your updates on Twitter because &#8221; + $Reason;<br />
end {implied &#8220;else do nothing&#8221; as it is now}</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ari Herzog</title>
		<link>http://www.markdrapeau.com/2009/04/expand-your-twitter-base/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Ari Herzog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 15:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markdrapeau.com/?p=193#comment-84</guid>
		<description>Interesting, Bob. You want Twitter to resemble Facebook and Linkedin (both of which require mutuality) to provide an optional personal message to the other side.

I&#039;m sure it can be easily implemented, with the message in the form of a tweet, but I can see that being abused, whereby a DM would be preferred but how to send a DM without that person following you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, Bob. You want Twitter to resemble Facebook and Linkedin (both of which require mutuality) to provide an optional personal message to the other side.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure it can be easily implemented, with the message in the form of a tweet, but I can see that being abused, whereby a DM would be preferred but how to send a DM without that person following you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob King</title>
		<link>http://www.markdrapeau.com/2009/04/expand-your-twitter-base/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 00:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markdrapeau.com/?p=193#comment-82</guid>
		<description>Great points Mark. I imagine most people do this also, that assessment of the last page of Tweets is something I do when deciding whether or not to follow someone.

When someone new follows me, I&#039;m always curious as to what motivated them to do so.  Sometimes it&#039;s obvious, like after I&#039;ve just followed them. Other times it&#039;s hard to determine.

I think it would interesting if Twitter added a field under the Follow/Unfollow button. In this optional field you could write the reason for the action.

So you&#039;d get updates like:

[JohnSmith] is now following your updates on Twitter because &quot;[reason specified]&quot;

OR

[JohnSmith] is no longer following your updates on Twitter because &quot;[reason specified]&quot;

That would provide feedback on what worked (and didn&#039;t work) so people could adjust accordingly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great points Mark. I imagine most people do this also, that assessment of the last page of Tweets is something I do when deciding whether or not to follow someone.</p>
<p>When someone new follows me, I&#8217;m always curious as to what motivated them to do so.  Sometimes it&#8217;s obvious, like after I&#8217;ve just followed them. Other times it&#8217;s hard to determine.</p>
<p>I think it would interesting if Twitter added a field under the Follow/Unfollow button. In this optional field you could write the reason for the action.</p>
<p>So you&#8217;d get updates like:</p>
<p>[JohnSmith] is now following your updates on Twitter because &#8220;[reason specified]&#8221;</p>
<p>OR</p>
<p>[JohnSmith] is no longer following your updates on Twitter because &#8220;[reason specified]&#8221;</p>
<p>That would provide feedback on what worked (and didn&#8217;t work) so people could adjust accordingly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
