No More, No Less: For Business Problems, Social Media Is What You Make Of It


Many times, when I hear someone talking about social media, they are merely reciting talking points.
 
Let me say that again, so that the next time you hear someone talking about social media, you hear it differently than you do now.
Many times, when I hear someone talking about social media, they are merely reciting talking points.
 
I am forced manytimes to listen to people talk about social media. And manytimes they are saying the same thing. Don't talk about eating a ham sandwich for lunch. Don't broadcast, be part of the conversation. Cliche after cliche. Bullet point after bullet point. Everyone's an expert – the same expert. And they are all selling the same product, which is the common wisdom.
 
The problem with this is that the people who truly succeed know all these cliches and have mastered the common wisdom and then they proceed to break one or more of these so-called "rules" in a fundamental way, dazzling their audience. (And then all the run of the mill "social media consultants" blog about it, and then try to copy it.)
 
Social media is what you make of it. No more, no less. It is not a cult. It is not a community. It is a set of tools that connect people and information. They do the same thing for everyone, no matter who you are and what your goals. They are no different than a phone, an email address, or an instant messaging handle. Not fundamentally.
 
Let's break down one of the most common cliches about a popular social media too, Twitter. Many people have said many times, "It's not about telling people what you had for lunch." The naysayers are wrong. They are so wrong that you should probably stop socializing with people who say this.
 
That's not because everyone wants to hear what you had for lunch, though. It's for at least two reasons.
 
One, some people are so good at storytelling that they could make an audience interested in their lunch for 10 minutes, live, unrehearsed. If you can't, you're a BAD storyteller. People will listen to good storytellers, and will not listen to average ones. And ultimately, media – any media, including the social kind – is about telling stories to an audience. Thus, lunch can be interesting. How you cook it, where you shop, who you're eating with, the ingredients, the time of day, the place you're eating, the special occasion, and any number of other aspects. If lunch is just "I'm eating a ham sandwich" to you, news flash – you're boring.
 
Two, lunch is a huge niche. As are breakfast, dinner, happy hour, and brunch. As is the food and beverage industry in general. Let me give you a personal example. I've recently started cooking more, and from time to time I broadcast what I'm making. This morning I made an omelet with almonds and honey (why not?), tweeted about it, and posted my recipe on my Facebook wall. Numerous people were interested, complimented me, made additional suggestions even. Rachel Ezrin from New York (who I don't really know), even paid me this compliment – I'm her go-to person for brunch info! How did that happen? I must be saying interesting things to my audience.
 
It goes further. Elon James has turned brunch, his hobby, into a business with his We Brunch Hard website. He has photos, text, community discussion, and t-shirts. He's turned a passion in to cash. He has a Twitter hashtag, a Facebook group, and a following. He has broken the rule about "not tweeting about your lunch" so hard that he's changed the game entirely. Some chefs and other people passionate about food may want to follow his lead.
 
True, you don't want to use social media to talk about what you eat all the time. But you don't want to use it to talk about anything all the time. If you do that, you're boring, and you're probably a failure at utilizing social media in a productive way, too. I talk about tech a lot. Elon talks about how he is not white. Everyone – every person, every consultant, and every brand – needs to change it up a bit. A pitcher who only throws fastballs gives up some home runs once people figure out his game.
 
The point is that most of the discussion around social media is so follow-the-leader, so trend-of-the-moment, so completely amateur, that it simply isn't worth listening to. I hate to break it to you, but only 10%, or maybe 5%, or maybe even 1% of people saying anything are saying anything both original and worth listening to. And besides the repetitiveness much of the rest of it is fanboy and fangirl salivation over the new geo-location feature of Twitter, the new Starbucks badge on FourSquare, and the new Digg overhaul. To them, social media is not a tool – it's a club that they're part of.
 
None of that matters to you, probably. You probably have a serious job and have serious problems to solve, or serious competition to destroy. Whatever the blogging heads are saying, you need to figure out if social media applies to you, and if so, the details of how. Don't pay attention to what people say it should be used for, pay attention to what YOU think it should be used for.
 
Experiment, brainstorm, act, succeed.
 
And remember – brunch is the most important meal of the day.
 

Posted via email from Mark’s Cheeky Posterous

Posted in Original Blog PostsComments (0)

How Trolls Highlight Your Individual Creativity


Many people like the kinds of things I write and you write and the kind of value that it provides to various online and offline communities. But some people don't, and that's fine. Some people disagree with blog posts or the content of people's talks, and that's fine too. Some people take it even a step further, sniping in a passive-agressive manner online, in public, or even going out of their way to criticize everything someone does.
 
The last class of people are called "trolls" in geek-speak.

I like trolls. They let you know people are paying attention even when they don't like you. They hang on your every word. They remind you that you're being controversial. They're evidence that you're challenging the status quo in a community, and forcing people to reconsider the way they think. They let you know that the content you create is alive.

Don't let trolls get you down. Your content probably has reach; theirs tends not to. Haters are very interesting… but only to their ten best friends. Once in a while their criticisms are valid, but tend to get lost in a sea of uselessness. So when something's targeted directly at you, take it with a grain of salt - probably, no one else even saw it.

Posted via email from Mark’s Cheeky Posterous

Posted in Original Blog PostsComments (0)

Judicious use of @ on Twitter


Lots of people say that Twitter is all about “the conversation.” Well, I think people and organizations can use it in a variety of ways not limited to listening and chatting. However, many people love to be part of conversations, and if that’s what is working for you then keep doing it. Some people, though, converse A LOT. Their entire stream is full of @. @@@. You know the type:

@robert Thanks!

@jill OMG so funny, yes!!!

@bobby RT @jill You gotta see http://funnyordie.com

Imagine 40 of these in a row. What does that tell you about someone? What impression does @ spew give a potential employer? Someone from the media looking you up? Your parents?

@@@

There’s nothing inherently “wrong” with @ spew, but keep in mind that your Twitter homepage is a landing page – it’s where people land when they look you up on Twitter for the first time, and subsequently. And a landing page full of @ is ugly. Remember, even if you’re fanatically @ing 40 people, there might be 400 or 4000 that aren’t involved in the conversation. They’re your “audience” too, in a way. Does your audience want to read @@@?

So remember, sometimes you can be part of the conversation by using @, and sometimes you can lead the conversation by providing new information to your audience. I recommend judicious use of @.

Posted via email from Mark’s Cheeky Posterous

Posted in Original Blog PostsComments (0)

How Many Social Networks Are You Part Of?


How many social networks are you a part of?
 
It's an interesting question when you think about it. Did you immediately think of Facebook? Sure, that's one, and it's  good one. But what about others? Maybe you use Twitter by now and have a network there. Maybe you love LinkedIn for communicating with work-related people.
 
But do you go beyond that? I do. I use (for example) GovLoop.com to join conversations about government and technology, LateNightShots.com to track the Washington, DC social scene (well, one version of it, anyway), and ASmallWorld.net to better understand the global poewr elite.
 
Take it further. Do you have a work email (Outlook or some other proprietary system), a side-business email account (Gmail, Hotmail…), and a personal email for friends and family? Those are three more social networks.
 
What organizations are you a part of? The PTA? Volunteering? Neighborhood watch? Those are all social networks as well.
 
Being part of a social network is rewarding in itself. But connecting ideas between them takes things to another level; often people in one community have solved a problem in a way that's useful to another community. Are you the person sharing those ideas across social networks?
 
Another level still is connecting people across social networks. Maybe you're a technologist and also have a passion for painting. When that artist you know needs a tech connection for a high-end art show, are you the person who "closes the triangle" of relationships?
 
Belonging to (genuinely) diverse social networks is great, but interweaving them is even better. Being a connector is a job in itself.
 

Posted via email from Mark’s Cheeky Posterous

Posted in Original Blog PostsComments Off

Who’s Using Government 2.0 Apps?


A recent New York Times story cited a report which revealed that the average iPhone or iPod Touch user only utilizes 5-10 apps on a regular basis. This, despite over 140,000 being available. There is a tremendous app glut.

In the Government 2.0 world, it's popular to develop apps that do something with government data. There have been contests called Apps for Democracy and Apps for America. They get a lot of hype before and during, but what about after? The apps developed for America are rarely heard from again, seemingly disappearing into the gigantic app glut, swallowed whole.

There are interesting apps, to be sure. But how many people who aren't tech elites use any of these apps? (What is the percentage of people who are residents of Washington, DC who even have an iPhone?)

If there's a study out there on this, I'd like to see it. Rarely has an app from a Government 2.0 apps content gone on to fame and fortune. Rarely has someone turned, say, a maps and crime app into something put in hotel kiosks for tourists, or adapted it so that it could be used via the simple texting that average people have.

Contests that are proof-of-principle are great, and necessary. But when will the meat and potatoes come? Many people in America saw how powerful the simple "text to donate $10 to the Red Cross for Haiti" initiative was (now it's being used for Chile, too); that was started by one person at the State Department. No content, no hype – just effectiveness.

If an app was created in a Government 2.0 event but no one uses it, was it ever really developed?

Posted via email from Mark’s Cheeky Posterous

Posted in Original Blog PostsComments Off

DC Will Debut “Digital Capital Week” in June 2010


Today, iStrategyLabs and Shiny Heart Ventures, in partnership with the DC Chief Technology Officer, the DC Office of Planning, and the Washington DC Economic Partnership, announced that they will produce Digital Capital Week in Washington, DC during June 2010. Just like Internet Week NY and similar events, Digital Capital Week will feature a series of distributed events produced and hosted by individuals, organizations and community groups.
 
Technologists, Artists, Entrepreneurs, Communicators, Govies, and social capitalists of all kinds are expectd to participate in this sure-to-be exciting event. There are many ways to get involved in showing how innovative Washington, DC and its public and private sectors really are, and in making the District a better place. Read much more information about connecting to Digital Capital Week here on the website.
 
Personal shout-out to Peter Corbett, Frank Gruber, and Jen Consalvo for getting this done! Kudos.
 

Posted via email from Mark’s Cheeky Posterous

Posted in Original Blog PostsComments Off

See more articles in the archive

Advertise Here
  • Popular
  • Latest
  • Comments
  • Tags
  • Subscribe
Advertise Here

Our Flickr Photos - See all photos